• Risk Queue
  • Posts
  • Wall Street Eyes SEC Deregulation, C-level Provide Guidance on Risk, Cyber AI, Bank Supervision Under Fire, Legal Risk Deep Dive

Wall Street Eyes SEC Deregulation, C-level Provide Guidance on Risk, Cyber AI, Bank Supervision Under Fire, Legal Risk Deep Dive

The Risk Queue for this week, the land of financial regulation and risk management—from the Fed's stress test overhaul to AI's transformation of banking security and the FCA's liquidity risk management findings, plus more!

-From Naeem, CEO & Founder - Risk On Q

PICKS:

  1. Headlines: SEC's New Leadership Signals Deregulation Wave | C-Suite Views on Risk Drivers

  2. AI & Tech Risk: AI Lift for Cyber Defense | Model Risk Management

  3. Risk Management: Bank Supervision Reality vs Myth | Liquidity Management Requires Daily Stress Testing | Legal Risk Defined

Risk Headlines

Key Points:

A coordinated effort by industry groups to influence the incoming SEC leadership under Paul Atkins to roll back regulations implemented during the Gensler era while expanding market access for their products. The significance extends beyond simple regulatory relief, representing a potential philosophical shift in how capital markets function and who can access various investment vehicles. The underlying regulatory developments are the fundamental tension between market access and investor protection, as Wall Street institutions push for deregulation that simultaneously reduces compliance burden while expanding their market reach to smaller investors. This shift represents not merely tactical regulatory relief but a strategic realignment of financial market structures that could redefine traditional boundaries between public and private markets, retail and institutional investors, and regulated versus alternative investment vehicles.

_________________________________

Key Points:

Top Risks report represents one of the most comprehensive global risk surveys available, capturing insights from over 1,200 board members and executives across industries and regions. Its significance lies in identifying a fundamental shift in how successful organizations conceptualize risk management - moving from siloed approaches toward integrated frameworks that recognize the interconnectedness of economic, technological, workforce, and geopolitical challenges.

The prioritization of economic uncertainty as the top near-term concern requires enhanced scenario planning and stress testing capabilities that can model complex interactions between inflation, interest rates, credit quality, and market volatility. Meanwhile, the emphasis on AI as both opportunity and risk highlights the need for governance frameworks that enable innovation while managing model risk, data privacy concerns, and ethical considerations.

Perhaps most importantly, the report's findings on risk communication and culture suggest that organizational approach to risk management has become a strategic differentiator.

A.I. Risk / Technology Risk

Key Points:

The banking security landscape is rapidly evolving with AI becoming essential rather than optional, as traditional systems struggle to keep pace with sophisticated threats, including deepfakes. Financial institutions implementing AI-powered solutions are seeing measurable benefits: improved fraud detection with fewer false positives, strengthened data privacy compliance with faster threat response times, and more effective AML processes with reduced costs.

_________________________________

Key Points:

The Research and Markets report on Artificial Intelligence Model Risk Management reveals a market at an inflection point, with projected growth from $6.7 billion in 2024 to $13.6 billion by 2030 at a 12.6% CAGR. This substantial growth trajectory signals that AI model risk management is transitioning from an emerging concern to a mainstream business imperative, particularly for financial institutions.

The report identifies several key drivers propelling this market forward. Regulatory pressure appears to be the most immediate catalyst, with government bodies increasingly imposing stricter guidelines for model transparency, fairness, and accountability. This regulatory focus is particularly acute in financial services, where AI-based decisions on lending, credit scoring, and fraud detection carry significant consequences for consumers and systemic stability.

Regulatory News - Fines, Losses, & Rules

Key Points:

The Federal Reserve's proposed overhaul of bank stress testing represents a significant win for the industry by addressing longstanding concerns about volatility, opacity, and implementation timelines, with the averaging of results over two years and extended adjustment periods offering more predictable capital planning. While these changes don't explicitly reduce capital requirements, they provide banks greater visibility into testing methodology and more time to optimize capital structures.

Perhaps most significantly, the Fed's plan to propose public comment on its stress test models and scenarios represents an unprecedented opening of the regulatory "black box." This has been a key industry priority, as banks have long argued that the opacity of the testing methodology makes preparation unnecessarily difficult and potentially arbitrary. While transparency generally serves the interests of sound governance, Michael Barr's concern that this could allow banks to "maximize results by identifying areas that may underestimate risk" highlights the tension between transparency and effectiveness.

_________________________________

Key Points:

The FCA's review of liquidity risk management practices reveals a significant divergence between regulatory expectations and common industry practices, highlighting both immediate vulnerabilities and longer-term strategic imperatives for financial institutions.

The findings suggest that many firms continue to treat liquidity risk management primarily as a compliance exercise rather than an operational capability critical to their survival during stress events. This approach creates dangerous blind spots, particularly as market structure evolves and new sources of liquidity risk emerge. The FCA's emphasis on daily dynamic stress testing sets a high bar that will require significant investment in both technology and expertise for many institutions to meet.

_________________________________

Key Points:

The Bank Policy Institute's analysis suggests that current bank supervision has evolved from ensuring safety and soundness through objective financial assessment into a more controlling regime where subjective governance evaluations can significantly constrain banking operations despite strong financial fundamentals.

For banks, this suggests focusing attention on governance documentation and examiner relationships alongside traditional financial metrics, while being aware that supervisory constraints could impact growth strategies even when financial fundamentals remain strong.

Risk Data to Geek Out On

Define Legal Risk Management - Managing Financial Risk - riskonq.com

This week, we will continue focusing on a key financial risk management program, moving to Legal Risk. Last week, we covered Systemic Risk. We have reached the end of an inclusive list of Financial Risk types. We will begin to focus on the non-financial risk management activities over the coming weeks, we will define these concepts to enhance our understanding and their application in the vast risk management ecosystem in the financial sector.

Legal Risk Management: Comprehensive Analysis for Financial Institutions

Legal Risk Management (LRM) is the process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks that arise from legal uncertainties, regulatory changes, contractual obligations, or litigation. For financial institutions, LRM is essential to avoid costly penalties, reputational harm, and operational disruptions, while ensuring compliance and business continuity.

1. Core Principles and Objectives

  • Compliance: Ensure all activities align with laws, regulations, and contractual obligations.

  • Risk Prevention: Identify legal vulnerabilities early to prevent lawsuits, fines, or regulatory sanctions.

  • Strategic Alignment: Integrate legal risk into overall risk management and business strategy.

  • Documentation: Maintain clear, enforceable contracts and records.

Distinct Types of Legal Risks

Risk Type

Impact on Financial Institutions

Regulatory/Compliance

Fines, sanctions, or business restrictions for non-compliance (e.g., AML, KYC, sanctions).

Contractual

Disputes or losses from unclear, unenforceable, or breached contracts.

Litigation

Legal costs, settlements, or judgments from lawsuits.

Data Privacy

Penalties for breaches of data protection laws (e.g., GDPR, CCPA).

Intellectual Property

Risks from infringing or failing to protect IP rights.

Interconnection with Other Risks

  • Operational Risk: Legal failures can trigger process breakdowns or business interruptions.

  • Reputational Risk: Legal issues can damage trust and brand value.

  • Financial Risk: Legal penalties and settlements impact earnings and capital.

  • Strategic Risk: Legal missteps can derail M&A or product launches.

2. Implementation in Financial Institutions

Institutional Adaptations

  • Banks: Embed legal reviews in product launches, lending, and collateral management.

  • Investment Firms: Conduct legal due diligence for investments and counterparty agreements.

  • Credit Unions: Regularly audit contracts and regulatory filings.

Regulatory Landscape

  • Basel Accords: Legal risk is part of operational risk capital requirements.

  • AML/KYC/Consumer Laws: Non-compliance leads to fines and restrictions.

  • Data Privacy Laws: Require strict data handling and reporting.

  • Sanctions Compliance: Avoid transactions with prohibited entities.

Product-Specific Risks

  • Loans: Legal enforceability of collateral and guarantees.

  • Derivatives: Legal clarity on netting and close-out provisions.

  • Securities: Compliance with disclosure and reporting rules.

Macroeconomic Factors

  • Regulatory changes and geopolitical events can quickly alter legal risk exposures.

3. Legal Risk Management Strategies

Risk Scoring & Monitoring

  • Legal Risk Assessments: Regularly review processes, contracts, and compliance.

  • Internal Audits: Identify and address legal vulnerabilities.

  • KPI/Scorecards: Track compliance rates, legal incidents, and litigation outcomes.

Contract & Litigation Management

  • Contract Review: Use standardized, regularly updated templates.

  • Litigation Tracking: Monitor disputes and outcomes for lessons learned.

Technology Integration

  • Legal Tech Platforms: Automate compliance tracking and document management.

  • AI/ML: Flag emerging risks and regulatory changes.

Training & Culture

  • Staff Training: Regular legal and compliance updates.

  • Reporting Culture: Encourage early reporting of issues.

4. Measurement and Metrics Framework

Metric Category

Key Tools

Compliance KPIs

% of filings on time, audit findings, training completion rates.

Litigation Metrics

Number and cost of lawsuits, average time to resolution.

Risk Appetite

Board-approved legal risk limits.

Early Warning Signals

Increases in complaints, regulatory inquiries, or contract disputes.

Success Metrics

Reduction in incidents, improved audit results, stakeholder confidence.

5. Emerging Risks & Digital Transformation

  • RegTech: Automates compliance and tracks regulatory changes in real time.

  • Cyber & Data Privacy: New threats and evolving laws require constant vigilance.

  • Globalization: Multi-jurisdictional exposures complicate compliance.

  • AI/ML: Used for contract analysis and early risk detection.

6. Best Practices and Recommendations

  1. Integrate Legal Risk into ERM: Align legal risk with enterprise risk management.

  2. Centralize Legal Oversight: Dedicated teams for compliance, contracts, and disputes.

  3. Leverage Technology: Automate monitoring and reporting.

  4. Continuous Training: Keep staff updated on legal changes.

  5. Regular Audits: Proactively find and fix compliance gaps.

Case Study Example

  • Major Bank: Faced regulatory fines for AML gaps. Implemented legal risk management software, centralized contract reviews, and increased training, reducing incidents by 40%.

Lessons Learned & Pitfalls

  • Pitfalls: Siloed legal teams, outdated templates, lack of real-time monitoring.

  • Lessons: Proactive, tech-enabled LRM reduces costs, enhances reputation, and ensures continuity.

_________________________________

Thank you for reading.

Naeem

p.s. If you find the Risk Queue newsletter helpful, please subscribe and share it with a friend or colleague. You can find it here!