Welcome back to the Risk Queue!

This week, the regulatory shifts and technological transformation that's reshaping the risk landscape across financial services. From the Fed's ambitious deregulatory agenda promising the most significant oversight changes since 2008, to the EU AI Act fundamentally altering how we think about model accuracy versus compliance, we're witnessing a pivotal moment where traditional risk frameworks are being rewritten in real time.

-From Naeem, CEO & Founder - Risk On Q

In today's Risk Queue:

• DOJ offers prosecutorial immunity for self-reporting

• AI edges out M&A as CFOs' top growth strategy,

• EU AI Act creates 2-year countdown to transform governance as model accuracy becomes regulatory liability

• $19M brokerage settlement

• Fed's deregulatory agenda

• Fraud losses hit $6.8B as AI-powered attacks surge 140%

Risk Headlines 

Risk Headlines

Exclusive | Justice Department Offers New Incentives for Companies to Self-Report Wrongdoing - source wsj.com

The DOJ policy represents a paradigm shift from adversarial enforcement to collaborative compliance partnership, where voluntary disclosure transforms from legal vulnerability into strategic protection mechanism.

This approach recognizes that corporate cooperation is essential for effective prosecution of complex white-collar crimes, particularly those involving international elements or sophisticated corporate structures. The policy creates a comprehensive incentive framework that ranges from complete prosecutorial immunity to substantial fine reductions, effectively making self-reporting the optimal legal strategy for most misconduct scenarios.

Key Points:

• Fundamental Prosecution Shield: Companies that self-report wrongdoing won't be prosecuted if they fully cooperate and fix compliance problems - representing the strongest prosecutorial immunity ever offered for voluntary disclosure across white-collar crimes

• Extraordinary Cooperation Standard: Even companies with executive involvement or significant profits from misconduct can avoid prosecution through "extraordinary cooperation" and immediate self-reporting with effective compliance programs - creating strategic incentives for proactive disclosure

• Financial Incentive Structure: Up to 75% discount on minimum fines for companies that don't qualify for full declination but self-report - fundamentally altering cost-benefit calculations for disclosure decisions

• Whistleblower Pressure Dynamics: Government whistleblower programs create financial incentives for employees to report externally, making proactive self-disclosure strategically defensive against uncontrolled external reporting

• Individual Prosecution Separation: Corporate declination doesn't protect guilty individuals, requiring sophisticated strategies to balance institutional protection with personal liability exposure for executives

  

A.I. Risk / Technology Risk

Top CFO growth strategy is AI by a nose - source cfo.com

CFOs are orchestrating a dramatic strategic pivot where AI investment (40%) barely edges out M&A and workforce expansion as primary growth drivers, reversing years of defensive cost-cutting.

This shift signals that competitors view AI not as operational enhancement but as existential competitive advantage, requiring immediate board-level strategic response.

Key Points:

• AI-Centric Growth Imperative: Technology investment becomes primary competitive differentiator

• Talent Strategy Reversal: Workforce expansion replaces cost-cutting as growth enabler

• Risk-Growth Convergence: CFOs integrate fraud prevention with AI adoption oversight

• Execution Pressure Intensification: Performance concerns despite increased investment capacity

_________________________________

The EU AI Act: A Risk Manager's Roadmap - source garp.org

The EU AI Act represents a paradigm shift where regulatory compliance transforms from operational constraint to competitive strategy, fundamentally altering how financial institutions approach AI development, deployment, and governance.

The regulation creates a new competitive landscape where transparency, explainability, and fairness become more valuable than pure predictive accuracy, forcing institutions to reimagine their technology strategies around responsible innovation rather than performance optimization.

Key Points:

• Competitive Advantage Reversal: Most accurate AI models now represent greatest regulatory liabilities - forcing fundamental reconsideration of technology investment strategies and potentially nullifying competitive advantages built on model sophistication

• Operational Timeline Crisis: Only 2-3 development cycles (until August 2026) to transform entire AI governance frameworks, creating unprecedented operational transformation pressure with limited execution runway

• Economics Transformation: High-risk models face shorter lifecycles, increased development costs, and expanded compliance monitoring - fundamentally altering AI ROI calculations and forcing difficult prioritization decisions about model viability

• Global Regulatory Cascade: EU standards becoming de facto international framework with UK, Canada, Singapore developing similar rules - making compliance unavoidable regardless of geographic footprint

• Trust as Competitive Differentiator: As AI-driven services commoditize, transparent and responsible AI use becomes primary customer acquisition and retention advantage

Regulatory News - Fines, Losses, & Rules

Regulatory News - Fines, Losses, & Rules

LPL, Edward Jones, other brokerages hit with multimillion-dollar settlement over excessive commissions - source investmentnews.com

A coordinated multistate investigation has exposed systematic commission overcharging practices across five major brokerages, resulting in $19 million in customer harm over 1.12 million trades and revealing fundamental industry-wide compliance failures.

The settlement follows established regulatory patterns with Massachusetts leading aggressive enforcement actions while explicitly warning of continued surveillance, creating immediate compliance review imperatives for all brokerage operations.

Key Points:

• Systemic Industry Exposure: Five major brokerages (Edward Jones, LPL, RBC, Stifel, TD Ameritrade) collectively violated commission rules across 1.12 million trades, indicating widespread industry practices that suggest potential broader regulatory scrutiny

• Regulatory Pattern Recognition: This follows similar 2023 Raymond James settlement ($4.2 million), demonstrating sustained regulatory focus on commission practices with Massachusetts Secretary Galvin explicitly warning of continued surveillance

• Scale of Customer Impact: $19 million in excessive commissions over five years represents systematic rather than isolated violations, with Edward Jones alone accounting for $11 million across 780,000+ trades

• Operational Compliance Failure: Minimum commission charges of $25-$95 per trade (often exceeding 5% of transaction value) violated FINRA Rule 2121, revealing fundamental gaps in supervisory procedures across multiple firms

• Expanding Enforcement Scope: Over 20 additional states signaling intent to join settlement indicates coordinated multistate regulatory action with potential for cascading enforcement across the industry

_________________________________

Fed's Bowman Lays out Ambitious Agenda to Overhaul and Ease Bank Oversight - source reuters.com

The Federal Reserve is orchestrating a comprehensive regulatory recalibration that abandons post-2008 defensive postures in favor of market-driven efficiency principles, where regulatory burden reduction becomes the primary policy objective across supervision, capital requirements, and institutional classifications.

This transformation reflects a fundamental shift from crisis-prevention mentality to competitive enablement philosophy, where regulatory frameworks are reengineered to promote banking sector growth rather than constrain systemic risk.

Geek Out On Risk Data

Risk Management

Managing Fraud Risk: A Key Subset of Non-Financial Risk - riskonq.com

This week, we’re turning our attention to Fraud Risk. Last week, we dove into Third-Party Risk, a Non-Financial Risk type. As we continue to expand the range of non-financial risk types, the scope of non-financial risks that banks must manage is even broader than their financial risks.

We will continue our focus on non-financial risk types to deepen our understanding and explore how they fit into the broader risk management ecosystem within the financial sector.

Fraud Risk Management: Comprehensive Analysis for Financial Institutions

Defining Fraud Risk Management

Fraud risk encompasses potential financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties arising from deliberate deception by internal or external actors. Unlike operational risk (which stems from process failures) or credit risk (linked to borrower defaults), fraud risk involves intentional malfeasance exploiting system vulnerabilities or human psychology.

Key Fraud Categories & Mechanisms

1. Payment Fraud

• Credit/Debit Card Fraud: Accounted for 42% of banking fraud losses in 2024, often through skimming devices or phishing attacks.

• Account Takeover (ATO): Fraudsters use credential stuffing (38% of cases) or SIM-swapping (22%) to hijack accounts, with 63% of incidents targeting mobile banking platforms.

2. Identity-Based Fraud

• Synthetic Identities: Combines real and fabricated PII to create "Frankenstein" personas, responsible for $6.8 billion in US losses in 2024.

• New Account Fraud: Fraudsters exploit lax KYC processes to open accounts using stolen identities, often for money laundering.

3. Social Engineering Scams

• Phishing 3.0: AI-generated deepfake voice clones enabled a 140% increase in authorized push payment (APP) fraud in 2024.

• Business Email Compromise (BEC): Accounted for 29% of corporate fraud losses, often targeting treasury departments.

4. Emerging Threats

• Quantum Computing-Enabled Fraud: Early-stage attacks exploiting legacy encryption protocols.

• Fraud-as-a-Service (FaaS): Dark web platforms offering scam toolkits for $500-$5,000, democratizing access to sophisticated attacks.

Regulatory Environment: Global Compliance Imperatives

US Frameworks

• Protecting Consumers from Payment Scams Act (2024): Mandates full reimbursement for APP fraud victims within 10 business days, with exemptions for gross negligence.

• FDIC Fraud Risk Management Guidelines (2025): Requires quarterly board-level reporting on fraud KPIs and AI model validation processes.

International Standards

• EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA): Mandates real-time fraud monitoring for cross-border transactions exceeding €50,000.

• UK Contingent Reimbursement Model (CRM): Shifts fraud liability to institutions failing to implement Confirmation of Payee checks.

• APRA CPS 234 (Australia): Imposes 72-hour breach notification timelines and annual third-party fraud audits.

Defense Strategies: Building a Fraud-Resilient Ecosystem

Technological Safeguards

AI/ML Detection Systems

• Behavioral biometrics analyzing 200+ parameters (keystroke dynamics, mouse movements) achieves 92% accuracy in spotting account takeovers.

• Graph analytics mapping transaction networks identified $1.2 billion in synthetic identity fraud across US banks in 2024.

Quantum-Resistant Infrastructure

• Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards being implemented for critical systems, with NIST-compliant algorithms reducing encryption breach risks by 68%.

Process Enhancements

• Dynamic Risk Scoring: Real-time evaluation of 120+ variables (device fingerprinting, geolocation) to adjust authentication requirements.

• Collaborative Intelligence Sharing: 85% of top US banks now participate in the Fraud Investigation & Resolution Exchange (FIRE) network.

Human-Centric Controls

• Teller Fraud Simulations: Monthly social engineering drills reduced susceptibility by 41% at a Top 10 US bank5.

• Customer Education Portals: Gamified training modules decreased phishing click-through rates by 33%.

Emerging Trends Reshaping Fraud Defense

Regulatory Technology (RegTech) Convergence

• Automated compliance engines now map transactions against 190+ global sanctions lists in <50ms, cutting false positives by 27%.

AI Arms Race

• Generative AI tools like FraudGPT enable hyper-personalized phishing, while defensive models using federated learning detect 94% of novel attack patterns.

Liability Shifts

• 73% of fraud losses now borne by institutions under new reimbursement rules, up from 58% in 2023.

Actionable Insights & Best Practices

Strategic Recommendations

1. Adopt a Zero-Trust Architecture: Implement continuous authentication across all customer touchpoints.

2. Deploy Explainable AI (XAI): Ensure fraud models meet regulatory transparency requirements.

3. Build Cross-Industry Coalitions: Share threat intelligence through platforms like FS-ISAC.

_________________________________

Thank you for reading.

Naeem

p.s. Empower your colleagues with essential risk intelligence. Forward the Risk Queue newsletter—trusted by leading financial professionals. Subscribe here!